Showing posts with label privacy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label privacy. Show all posts

Thursday, 6 September 2012

Droneworld - Part II

Following on from the Newsnight article, I was interviewed by Phil Gayle on BBC Radio Oxford the following morning. It was only a short interview but the whole of the Breakfast Show was dedicated to this issue of Drones.

Phil Galye, the Presenter was attempting to stir the listeners up into an anti-drone movement, citing 'privacy issues' and 'Not in my back yard' (NIMBY) concerns. 'What if I were sunbathing in my garden at the same time as you were photographing my neighbour's house?' was one question for example. Are these drones going to peer into bedroom windows?

I only had 2-3 minutes for the whole interview, which wasn't adequate to put the points that I needed across, so here's my ideal interview transcript.

Phil Gayle: Good morning. We are talking about the new rules regarding Drones and that we may be seeing hundreds of them criss-crossing the UK. Are you concerned about your privacy? Do you think this is a good thing or bad? I have in the studio Andy Crowhurst, owner of Overshoot Photos to discuss this with me. Good Morning, Andy.

Me: Good Morning Phil.

PG: So, this drone you fly. What is it used for?

Me: I photograph all sorts of things, anything where an elevated view would enhance the subject. I've photographed private properties as Anniversary presents and also for Estate Agents to help sell it. I photograph photogenic Hotels and Penthouse views from properties that are yet to be built. I've even shot a scrapyard.

PG: So, if I was sunbathing and you were filming next door, would I be in the photo or would you crop me out. It seems a bit of an invasion of privacy.

Me: The chances are that you would be in the photo if I was to shoot the back garden, but usually I'm only shooting the front. In my experience, if I was shooting the back garden you would not fail to notice me and my Client, your neighbour would also alert you. More often than not you'd be round to see the craft. Most people I meet are fascinated by it and I have yet to meet someone concerned about it.

PG: What if I were in my bedroom doing my usual naked exercises - or worse and failed to spot you?

Me: Have you ever tried to look in a neighbours window? - you don't need to answer that - The distance, angles and reflections make it pretty unlikely that anything could see inside and, even then, assuming that the curtains were open, the chances of catching you seem pretty slim. The cameras that I use are pretty limited due to weight constraints and I am there for professional purposes. If someone wanted to snoop, they would be better off up a distant tree with a camera with a decent zoom than hovering a pretty obvious drone outside your window.

I test my drone and cameras out in my garden and the pictures I take of the house do not show inside. Too many reflections.

PG: What does the law say about all this snooping?

Me: With a couple of exceptions, anyone with a camera is allowed to photograph anyone else in a public place. Or a private place from a public place. Or from a private place with the owner's permission. Just because the camera is attached to the Drone doesn't make the law any different, in fact we have more restrictions because of where we are and are not allowed to fly. There are many times more cameras and CCTV equipment snooping on us that the handful of drones that are in existence. You can get disguised cameras the size of cigarette packets transmitting images back to base. That is scarier.

We are professionals doing a professional job and, like all professions, there may be a darker side but the cost of the equipment and the licencing means that you need to be pretty determined to use it for nefarious purposes.

PG: That seems reassuring. Andy Crowhurst, owner of Overshoot Photos, thank you.

Friday, 31 August 2012

Changes afoot in Droneworld

An article on Newsnight last night is saying that the US FAA (Federal Aviation Authority) is being ordered by Congress to open up its airspace to Drones by September 2015.

The UK's airspace regulator, the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), told BBC Newsnight that large unmanned drones could be flying in British skies by 2020.

As with most new ideas, feelings are already running high with campaigns to make US Towns and Cities 'drone free' and people voicing their fears over safety - both in respect of loads carried and also drones colliding with aircraft and/or falling out of the sky.


At the moment, the FAA does not allow drones to be used commercially such as for taking aerial photographs at all so this is coming as a bit of a shock to it. Here in the UK we are in a better position. The CAA has recognised that the UAV / Drone field is growing and branching out from the amateur Radio Controlled hobbyist.

Since 2010, anyone wishing to operate a flying object that 'acquires data' (read: takes photographs) needs to obtain a Permission from the CAA, renewable annually. This goes for Drones, kites, blimps, modified RC Helicopters and so on. In praise of the CAA, although it seems to have been initially caught on the hop by the proliferation of this market, it has come up with a set of regulations that are sensible and proportionate to the size of craft and also reasonable in the conditions of use. I have been operating within them for three years and have found the CAA very helpful where interaction is needed and sensibly hands-off where not, leaving me to Risk Assess a shoot on the day. In Canada, for instance each shoot requires submission of a bundle of paperwork for approval days / weeks beforehand which, to me sounds pretty impractical.

To that end I have no doubt that the CAA will come up with a working regulatory environment. It has already stated that anything over 20Kg must be fitted with a 'sense and avoid' mechanism and that it would have to be approved for use in UK airspace in the same way as commercial aircraft.

Privacy

Does anyone realistically think that spying is  not going on already with affordable high zoom cameras and miniature cameras that can be concealed in a space the size of a cigarette packet. A drone is not opening up a new can of worms it is just another platform that could be used for an existing problem.

Safety

Yes, Drones are going to fall out of the sky (they do already), yes they are going to get used inappropriately by someone that has bought one off eBay. Yes, there will be spying on neighbours. We will never get rid of the unlicenced and black market users, in the same way that there are car drivers driving around with no licence and insurance, but by putting a licencing framework in place beforehand and managing it properly the UK can build up a great Drone industry and perhaps lead the world in this burgeoning technology whilst the FAA is still trying to fight it's walled garden.


Do you think this is a step too far? Do you have privacy concerns?
Do you shrug your shoulders and bundle it within the CCTVs and Google Streetview, thinking that we cannot stop it and/or anything that makes the country safer has to be a good thing?

Let me know.


Drone in Newsnight Studio: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19436049
BBC Article: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19397816
FAA Forecast: http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/apl/aviation_forecasts/aerospace_forecasts/2012-2032/media/Unmanned%20Aircraft%20Systems.pdf